Slate | By Mark Joseph Stern | June 29, 2020
While Chief Justice Roberts siding with the liberal justices on this case presented a clear benefit, he did so with a caveat and wrote a separate opinion. This opinion concurred with the judgment to strike down Act 620, but narrowed the scope of the “undue burden” precedent set in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. This piece discussed how this legal strategy works and the implications it could have on abortion access in the future.
The Abortion Library 